Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-19 08:40:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83AB5612709E8BD9A6500D282399A0E498D06C4F9C41B667AD1CE11EB4AB0A7E
Participant Details

Original Note:

「明確に知事からパワハラを受けたと言う人はいなかったが、自分ではパワハラにあたるか判断ができないと言う人もいたので、聞いた事実がパワハラにあたるか評価したい。」 という回答の一部を切り取ったものです。 https://youtu.be/eD34d53DAPU?si=C-rJKR94pfNd5526&t=397

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858765146019229740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83AB5612709E8BD9A6500D282399A0E498D06C4F9C41B667AD1CE11EB4AB0A7E
  • createdAtMillis - 1732005627089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 185876514601922974083AB5612709E8BD9A6500D282399A0E498D06C4F9C41B667AD1CE11EB4AB0A7E