Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 03:24:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC3991405D9D4CA12AF1E312C441C84A4309A8CFC101DCA5AE3E6864291FAB69
Participant Details

Original Note:

 この記事に、パワハラをすると記載されておらず、投稿主の私見や憶測である。  また、明確にパワハラをしたかは、不明であり、実際に当選しているので疑惑は疑惑のままでしかありません。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/87debb3315cb1bb7988807dfcecda048bfefed91

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858715457131606260
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC3991405D9D4CA12AF1E312C441C84A4309A8CFC101DCA5AE3E6864291FAB69
  • createdAtMillis - 1732073050261
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858715457131606260AC3991405D9D4CA12AF1E312C441C84A4309A8CFC101DCA5AE3E6864291FAB69