Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-19 13:37:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E06F680602644C382018DB3CA1A83CD9D24D772459A5DF366AFA98211CADEC40
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN—“anonymous sources” has been fine for mainstream stories later proven false, it’s fine here too.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858624392525222248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E06F680602644C382018DB3CA1A83CD9D24D772459A5DF366AFA98211CADEC40
  • createdAtMillis - 1732023443924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858624392525222248E06F680602644C382018DB3CA1A83CD9D24D772459A5DF366AFA98211CADEC40