Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 22:33:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A3CEA3465856CA30807D3C3FE8A791388A1D0C21C580BF84BE7BE78609CE4192
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN—“anonymous sources” has been fine for mainstream stories later proven false, it’s fine here too.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858624392525222248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A3CEA3465856CA30807D3C3FE8A791388A1D0C21C580BF84BE7BE78609CE4192
  • createdAtMillis - 1731969209237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858624392525222248A3CEA3465856CA30807D3C3FE8A791388A1D0C21C580BF84BE7BE78609CE4192