Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 18:35:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B046BAD194DB8D7E86F42AD4994E76B6034CB7438789B44135D4F7EF8672F96
Participant Details

Original Note:

These notes are not disputing her claims, they’re just saying the evidence she’s presenting must be wrong because the government said something different. Leave that discussion for the replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858507545020608692
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B046BAD194DB8D7E86F42AD4994E76B6034CB7438789B44135D4F7EF8672F96
  • createdAtMillis - 1731954946032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18585075450206086925B046BAD194DB8D7E86F42AD4994E76B6034CB7438789B44135D4F7EF8672F96