Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 15:20:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0802804039764350C09E62FB116F449D9200B07A71D4712BFCFD917299DB2257
Participant Details

Original Note:

“according to the lancet” is a lie. The number appears in an opinion letter to the editor. It wasn’t a peer-reviewed study or an article. Author Martin McKee, has issued a clarification shortly after that. https://t.co/GkcE5RrpiR Recently The Lancet published 2 letters debunking those numbers. https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1853684748238885169

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858480802146795903
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0802804039764350C09E62FB116F449D9200B07A71D4712BFCFD917299DB2257
  • createdAtMillis - 1731943258908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18584808021467959030802804039764350C09E62FB116F449D9200B07A71D4712BFCFD917299DB2257