Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 22:36:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 149A22791240203C270B5E91169D5FB39A309A6D8A5C157CF7EFF0D4022EFD5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - A proposal for a discussion based on OP's opinion does not warrant a note, certainly not one whose source has no mention of the public perception of a political lobby. Move it to the coments, AIPAC.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858378292933382438
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 149A22791240203C270B5E91169D5FB39A309A6D8A5C157CF7EFF0D4022EFD5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1731969411309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858378292933382438149A22791240203C270B5E91169D5FB39A309A6D8A5C157CF7EFF0D4022EFD5F