Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 01:56:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

根拠の無いデマです。 https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/disasters/artificial-earthquake-theory-debunked-experts-explain/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/amp/k10014307161000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858310811326050421
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1731894995977
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18583108113260504214062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB