Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 01:54:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FF2763BD530A2DA6C8B4FF6252962A49F38E2C405C8F5D6E8F92710A42C51DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

根拠の無いデマです。 https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/disasters/artificial-earthquake-theory-debunked-experts-explain/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/amp/k10014307161000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858310811326050421
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FF2763BD530A2DA6C8B4FF6252962A49F38E2C405C8F5D6E8F92710A42C51DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1731894870934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18583108113260504213FF2763BD530A2DA6C8B4FF6252962A49F38E2C405C8F5D6E8F92710A42C51DE