Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 08:04:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9D6D0C87FF13B61BA98BC990E2BAB93CD197D9B3878E8F8935DB6BD08DA13EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

根拠の無いデマです。 https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/disasters/artificial-earthquake-theory-debunked-experts-explain/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/amp/k10014307161000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858310083974992092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9D6D0C87FF13B61BA98BC990E2BAB93CD197D9B3878E8F8935DB6BD08DA13EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1732089862578
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858310083974992092B9D6D0C87FF13B61BA98BC990E2BAB93CD197D9B3878E8F8935DB6BD08DA13EB