Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 01:00:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B1A9699F4C570D13F419D2D6E38CE5305FE89FDF87D4182588360B3FAEF2F35
Participant Details

Original Note:

根拠の無いデマです。 https://www.factcheckcenter.jp/fact-check/disasters/artificial-earthquake-theory-debunked-experts-explain/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/amp/k10014307161000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858310083974992092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B1A9699F4C570D13F419D2D6E38CE5305FE89FDF87D4182588360B3FAEF2F35
  • createdAtMillis - 1731891611902
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18583100839749920927B1A9699F4C570D13F419D2D6E38CE5305FE89FDF87D4182588360B3FAEF2F35