Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-19 07:34:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F65D96DD916D929A62C106AA43C6A37D905261C1EF13658F394B0992EE98B4DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

En general, los resultados implican que, si bien algunos aspectos de la participación en la plataforma parecen haber mejorado ampliamente, las ventajas específicas de visibilidad pueden haberse aplicado selectivamente. Estudio completo. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858300513793585184
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F65D96DD916D929A62C106AA43C6A37D905261C1EF13658F394B0992EE98B4DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1732001664587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1858300513793585184F65D96DD916D929A62C106AA43C6A37D905261C1EF13658F394B0992EE98B4DD