Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 21:48:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B81D7D377C15790FC30A85889CA927643D58C3433FD309D9BE1F61C6F3A41D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

En general, los resultados implican que, si bien algunos aspectos de la participación en la plataforma parecen haber mejorado ampliamente, las ventajas específicas de visibilidad pueden haberse aplicado selectivamente. Estudio completo. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858300513793585184
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B81D7D377C15790FC30A85889CA927643D58C3433FD309D9BE1F61C6F3A41D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1731966485885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18583005137935851841B81D7D377C15790FC30A85889CA927643D58C3433FD309D9BE1F61C6F3A41D0