Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 18:51:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B09C2E9A5302FC99766DE8098B7121000DA79A95F178D851474F50D350B96326
Participant Details

Original Note:

The research: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/1/A_computational_analysis_of_potential_algorithmic_bias_on_platform_X_during_the_2024_US_election-4.pdf The published algoritm of X hasn't changed since 13 july 2023. Odd, isn't it. Also unlikely it would openly contain personal adaptations.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858214818018173389
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B09C2E9A5302FC99766DE8098B7121000DA79A95F178D851474F50D350B96326
  • createdAtMillis - 1731869480644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858214818018173389B09C2E9A5302FC99766DE8098B7121000DA79A95F178D851474F50D350B96326