Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 01:17:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5672E2A2574D1D49F5763BC916B4C73B4FA691C96EC69B3BDC8BB4B46EBF0766
Participant Details

Original Note:

ChatGPT is not a reliable source. It's not an archive, it's a large language model and highly prone to making factual errors. When faced with direct informational queries, it may 'hallucinate' an entirely fabricated response. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07421-0 https://www.superannotate.com/blog/ai-hallucinations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1858211048068698348
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5672E2A2574D1D49F5763BC916B4C73B4FA691C96EC69B3BDC8BB4B46EBF0766
createdAtMillis - 1731892627474
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18582110480686983485672E2A2574D1D49F5763BC916B4C73B4FA691C96EC69B3BDC8BB4B46EBF0766