Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 19:28:43 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C44E2DA894D121F7A9A3DD1512333A405A2C676B41BA80F7E83549D33CBE4B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

ChatGPT is not a reliable source. It's not an archive, it's a large language model and highly prone to making factual errors. When faced with direct informational queries, it may 'hallucinate' an entirely fabricated response. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07421-0 https://www.superannotate.com/blog/ai-hallucinations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1858211048068698348
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1C44E2DA894D121F7A9A3DD1512333A405A2C676B41BA80F7E83549D33CBE4B8
createdAtMillis - 1731871723200
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18582110480686983481C44E2DA894D121F7A9A3DD1512333A405A2C676B41BA80F7E83549D33CBE4B8