Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-18 09:02:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6599AECE0F4C7DA789FAEBA350A71E9783357FA052FB0D0FEC80B2C6E23D0D1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Auswahlalgorithmus von @X ist transparent. Hier ist eine Beschreibung: https://blog.x.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm und hier ist der Quellcode: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm Die Behauptung, das wäre nicht transparent, ist daher falsch.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858148389856153796
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6599AECE0F4C7DA789FAEBA350A71E9783357FA052FB0D0FEC80B2C6E23D0D1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1731920561356
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18581483898561537966599AECE0F4C7DA789FAEBA350A71E9783357FA052FB0D0FEC80B2C6E23D0D1E