Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 21:56:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B4A7049ACD2361CA5E87E4C47268DF031257090EEF244C2F28FBD659906F0397
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is factually correct. The proposed note from "eloquent pine penguin" demonstrates the expected "whataboutery" from the OP (source original post). My opinion is the proposed CN would be better in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858100329088229882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B4A7049ACD2361CA5E87E4C47268DF031257090EEF244C2F28FBD659906F0397
  • createdAtMillis - 1731880582695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1858100329088229882B4A7049ACD2361CA5E87E4C47268DF031257090EEF244C2F28FBD659906F0397