Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 16:33:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AA2FFFCDDAAD31DFC45104E77C1A4A3D3E0B5C654338D2C1B55E993635024ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is factually correct. The proposed note from "eloquent pine penguin" demonstrates the expected "whataboutery" from the OP (source original post). My opinion is the proposed CN would be better in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858100329088229882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AA2FFFCDDAAD31DFC45104E77C1A4A3D3E0B5C654338D2C1B55E993635024ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1731861227991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18581003290882298826AA2FFFCDDAAD31DFC45104E77C1A4A3D3E0B5C654338D2C1B55E993635024ED