Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 17:34:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36BC3E7408D542F482CF1F352A135AAD3D8A6FDD3B70BE87FE93A4C428EF5937
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is factually correct. The proposed note from "eloquent pine penguin" demonstrates the expected "whataboutery" from the OP (source original post). My opinion is the proposed CN would be better in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858100329088229882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36BC3E7408D542F482CF1F352A135AAD3D8A6FDD3B70BE87FE93A4C428EF5937
  • createdAtMillis - 1731864860020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185810032908822988236BC3E7408D542F482CF1F352A135AAD3D8A6FDD3B70BE87FE93A4C428EF5937