Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 11:23:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0532EF44BE5FA579630FD7143D0E065628257C7AA13DA11F544DDF5F98FD01F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is factually correct. The proposed note from "eloquent pine penguin" demonstrates the expected "whataboutery" from the OP (source original post). My opinion is the proposed CN would be better in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858100329088229882
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0532EF44BE5FA579630FD7143D0E065628257C7AA13DA11F544DDF5F98FD01F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1731842625964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18581003290882298820532EF44BE5FA579630FD7143D0E065628257C7AA13DA11F544DDF5F98FD01F7