Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 20:02:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C7AFC87C5BF0426C6BE1066C51BB28E88527E95D8EDB0ABD7D938BEA3FE9DD5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This data analysis suggests the "possibility of algorithmic priortisation or bias" but provides NO EVIDENCE. Using data analysis alone to confirm your hypothesis is called "Confirmation Bias". https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857953294230110613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C7AFC87C5BF0426C6BE1066C51BB28E88527E95D8EDB0ABD7D938BEA3FE9DD5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1731873753544
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857953294230110613C7AFC87C5BF0426C6BE1066C51BB28E88527E95D8EDB0ABD7D938BEA3FE9DD5F