Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 08:00:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33C3D3290E4FE4167B3E294662672A2A720BF1C623FA62BA54A159932161FAA5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This data analysis suggests the "possibility of algorithmic priortisation or bias" but provides NO EVIDENCE. Using data analysis alone to confirm your hypothesis is called "Confirmation Bias". https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857953294230110613
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33C3D3290E4FE4167B3E294662672A2A720BF1C623FA62BA54A159932161FAA5
  • createdAtMillis - 1731830453140
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185795329423011061333C3D3290E4FE4167B3E294662672A2A720BF1C623FA62BA54A159932161FAA5