Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 19:07:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43344A98C5EAF6B70B26D4C41AD1580178F36870449B7F5102F0B5B4C115B16A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study shown in the image has several major flaws that confound the results. These include using a small, nonrandom sample of Twitter accounts, and comparing official accounts of liberal politicians to right-wing commentators who already had far more followers. https://x.com/tracewoodgrains/status/1857778544648004069?s=46&t=SWUS-tT7iYax1OxtX4nxfA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1857825007101161911
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 43344A98C5EAF6B70B26D4C41AD1580178F36870449B7F5102F0B5B4C115B16A
createdAtMillis - 1731784023162
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 185782500710116191143344A98C5EAF6B70B26D4C41AD1580178F36870449B7F5102F0B5B4C115B16A