Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-17 09:17:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEF16A1882A440E15B7A30462DE3DF7B1FF0A232A672E5B3C742A0A6F299DAED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper in question explicitly specifies that retweets and favorites increased in similar ways for the sample of 5 Republican and 5 Democratic accounts. Only views show a discrepancy. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857781270870122984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEF16A1882A440E15B7A30462DE3DF7B1FF0A232A672E5B3C742A0A6F299DAED
  • createdAtMillis - 1731835063724
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1857781270870122984BEF16A1882A440E15B7A30462DE3DF7B1FF0A232A672E5B3C742A0A6F299DAED