Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 03:01:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4136597476086AC842484D6C5E624894F1B2C39BC9D4B82A8F95CF3842AEDDDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The paper in question explicitly specifies that retweets and favorites increased in similar ways for the sample of 5 Republican and 5 Democratic accounts. Only views show a discrepancy. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/253211/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857781270870122984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4136597476086AC842484D6C5E624894F1B2C39BC9D4B82A8F95CF3842AEDDDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1732071691279
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18577812708701229844136597476086AC842484D6C5E624894F1B2C39BC9D4B82A8F95CF3842AEDDDB