Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 12:23:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The evidence in this CN do not refute the AP’s claim that Hegseth was accused. They merely do not go as far as the AP and say he was involved. But they are not proof that he wasn’t accused. Meanwhile, other sources also say he was accused. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna180319

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857583526343762088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1731759816901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857583526343762088D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1