Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 01:12:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 139D15D0F40E7934A3B02D13D6033DBBA0AF8BE60FCD333551A93F40EFAE0404
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The evidence in this CN do not refute the AP’s claim that Hegseth was accused. They merely do not go as far as the AP and say he was involved. But they are not proof that he wasn’t accused. Meanwhile, other sources also say he was accused. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna180319

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857583526343762088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 139D15D0F40E7934A3B02D13D6033DBBA0AF8BE60FCD333551A93F40EFAE0404
  • createdAtMillis - 1731719525778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857583526343762088139D15D0F40E7934A3B02D13D6033DBBA0AF8BE60FCD333551A93F40EFAE0404