Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 04:56:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD8DD0490D9E43C3786EAF220D3E6E467909DF583687E00BC02038E080801BDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you bothered to read the WaPo article it clearly states that it was not the cross tattoo, but a different tattoo which isn't identified by the author. Also, interesting that the current CM and comments immediately assumed it was the Jerusalem Cross tattoo. Telling. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/15/pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-investigation/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857552086747005036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD8DD0490D9E43C3786EAF220D3E6E467909DF583687E00BC02038E080801BDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1731733011898
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857552086747005036FD8DD0490D9E43C3786EAF220D3E6E467909DF583687E00BC02038E080801BDF