Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 22:57:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07A1825088AE8F0EACFE31D65177C1EF51ED81889E23C377D206C624E2AD139C
Participant Details

Original Note:

If you bothered to read the WaPo article it clearly states that it was not the cross tattoo, but a different tattoo which isn't identified by the author. Also, interesting that the current CM and comments immediately assumed it was the Jerusalem Cross tattoo. Telling. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/15/pete-hegseth-sexual-assault-investigation/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857552086747005036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07A1825088AE8F0EACFE31D65177C1EF51ED81889E23C377D206C624E2AD139C
  • createdAtMillis - 1731711430428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185755208674700503607A1825088AE8F0EACFE31D65177C1EF51ED81889E23C377D206C624E2AD139C