Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 20:55:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F74235F60551C8E4DE2F78770709321ECD9C1C8110BDFDDA30468D846B623D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's possible that CNBC was not the source, but a negative google search is not strong enough evidence for a community note. Here is one source for the underlying claim that these advertisers have returned to X. https://www.adweek.com/media/advertisers-returning-to-x/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857523405706424758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F74235F60551C8E4DE2F78770709321ECD9C1C8110BDFDDA30468D846B623D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1731704148221
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18575234057064247584F74235F60551C8E4DE2F78770709321ECD9C1C8110BDFDDA30468D846B623D4