Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 17:01:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13A88D8D8074BBA0233AD7F4C3FD498EA3EE7E464DA5B192910A2D0CFE40C421
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's possible that CNBC was not the source, but a negative google search is not strong enough evidence for a community note. Here is one source for the underlying claim that these advertisers have returned to X. https://www.adweek.com/media/advertisers-returning-to-x/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857523405706424758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13A88D8D8074BBA0233AD7F4C3FD498EA3EE7E464DA5B192910A2D0CFE40C421
  • createdAtMillis - 1731776505274
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185752340570642475813A88D8D8074BBA0233AD7F4C3FD498EA3EE7E464DA5B192910A2D0CFE40C421