Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 16:31:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AAF568F687D1C520D4BB03F73B027F6D0D89198457C0A4C5BF4E9C0112EA6CB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Begründung für die Durchsuchung bezog sich nicht auf den Verdacht der Volksverhetzung, wie in dem Beschluss ersichtlich ist. (Bessere Qualität) https://x.com/i_iangg/status/1857439910141022714?t=NPi8wd_kxdRMauhDMlT1eA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857458593152332244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AAF568F687D1C520D4BB03F73B027F6D0D89198457C0A4C5BF4E9C0112EA6CB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1731688307361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1857458593152332244AAF568F687D1C520D4BB03F73B027F6D0D89198457C0A4C5BF4E9C0112EA6CB2