Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 16:49:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 356E2B9E3DE322C99FC3AEC51FFC68334F43F820A39AF645D503312515B0E7CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Begründung für die Durchsuchung bezog sich nicht auf den Verdacht der Volksverhetzung, wie in dem Beschluss ersichtlich ist. (Bessere Qualität) https://x.com/i_iangg/status/1857439910141022714?t=NPi8wd_kxdRMauhDMlT1eA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857458593152332244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 356E2B9E3DE322C99FC3AEC51FFC68334F43F820A39AF645D503312515B0E7CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1731689373158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857458593152332244356E2B9E3DE322C99FC3AEC51FFC68334F43F820A39AF645D503312515B0E7CE