Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 16:07:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 948670437D22B3D08B0659E8167B16C5D1CD5151F200298E8C315FA06DCB1248
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die Begründung für die Durchsuchung bezog sich nicht auf den Verdacht der Volksverhetzung, wie in dem Beschluss ersichtlich ist. https://x.com/Arnd_Diringer/status/1857421914941100256 https://x.com/JosefFLindner/status/1857393095907693020

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857445074533286192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 948670437D22B3D08B0659E8167B16C5D1CD5151F200298E8C315FA06DCB1248
  • createdAtMillis - 1731686863383
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857445074533286192948670437D22B3D08B0659E8167B16C5D1CD5151F200298E8C315FA06DCB1248