Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 13:25:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22060C0390C452A38F95D8340540C0AD7AD7661FD95D380B3BC096E26A5E9C1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Reine Interpretation, das kann nur die Behörde selbst aufklären. Sehr wahrscheinlich in den Fokus geraten ist der Urheber durch den Post gegen Habeck und die Anzeige, die Durchsuchung fand sehr wahrscheinlich wegen des Verdachts der Volksverhetzung statt

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857411361950629943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22060C0390C452A38F95D8340540C0AD7AD7661FD95D380B3BC096E26A5E9C1B
  • createdAtMillis - 1731677108726
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185741136195062994322060C0390C452A38F95D8340540C0AD7AD7661FD95D380B3BC096E26A5E9C1B