Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 10:55:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2BBE93A580C4BC6DF5FD6634273BC72CDCD1A4A5FBFD45D68810CFA1D6CD664
Participant Details

Original Note:

斎藤氏がパワハラをしていなかったという主張を「根拠不明」と断定していますが、兵庫県の公益通報担当部署が7月20日に公表した是正要請では、「パワハラ疑惑については一部で強く叱責されたと認識する職員もいたが、認定には至らなかった」とされており、一定の根拠はあることに注意が必要です。 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUF200660Q4A720C2000000/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857371927092039787
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2BBE93A580C4BC6DF5FD6634273BC72CDCD1A4A5FBFD45D68810CFA1D6CD664
  • createdAtMillis - 1731668102916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1857371927092039787E2BBE93A580C4BC6DF5FD6634273BC72CDCD1A4A5FBFD45D68810CFA1D6CD664