Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 15:10:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo, literalmente, sólo dice 1 vez "VOX", nombrando por encima el supuesto estudio de sus votantes sin entrar en detalles sobre su realización. La publicación consiste, principalmente, en una entrevista a Clara Pretus, donde esta da su opinión personal y no contrastada. https://archive.ph/qaxCX

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1857341722784641343
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C
createdAtMillis - 1731683437409
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1857341722784641343C8EB5360B2DDDF40DBF562009F5EDEF359CDD528F274757176A1C8680815194C