Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 13:00:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 412C4DF14C64698192AA9BA6E2F4693E202A0BC9B8DB755A9D6FFEB3DE36B49A
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo, literalmente, sólo dice 1 vez "VOX", nombrando por encima el supuesto estudio de sus votantes sin entrar en detalles sobre su realización. La publicación consiste, principalmente, en una entrevista a Clara Pretus, donde esta da su opinión personal y no contrastada. https://archive.ph/qaxCX

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857341722784641343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 412C4DF14C64698192AA9BA6E2F4693E202A0BC9B8DB755A9D6FFEB3DE36B49A
  • createdAtMillis - 1731675629828
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857341722784641343412C4DF14C64698192AA9BA6E2F4693E202A0BC9B8DB755A9D6FFEB3DE36B49A