Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 01:41:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 783214DCFAEC2E47C5DE482EA6F73FBB70B141DDB9D16E22BCF04F5D80AA6FB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

ChatGPT puede ser inducido a dar una respuesta sesgada en base a información provista en la/las preguntas previamente realizadas. https://direct.mit.edu/dint/article/6/1/201/118839/The-Limitations-and-Ethical-Considerations-of No debe tomarse a ChatGPT como fuente de información confiable en ningún caso: https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1857207321971003399
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 783214DCFAEC2E47C5DE482EA6F73FBB70B141DDB9D16E22BCF04F5D80AA6FB1
createdAtMillis - 1731634903986
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1857207321971003399783214DCFAEC2E47C5DE482EA6F73FBB70B141DDB9D16E22BCF04F5D80AA6FB1