Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 00:06:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

虚偽の画像です 本来はこの下部にガソリン補助金の部分が記載され、本来ガソリン補助金が無かった場合の価格と比較出来るように作成された図表です 現在は新しい形式のものが存在します https://www.sankei.com/article/20231130-EEDKA3CLBNB6NAURYDAOBBYCCQ/ また、各部の細かい内訳がない為に総額の違いに関わらず誤解を招く不正確な画像であることにも注意が必要です

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857098860310430145
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1731629209226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1857098860310430145481505C17E6A0C67A99A44DD64293B8531502D2FE09955BACC8AF6CC8F82CBA6