Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 18:20:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36362A35400443CB932B790B4962CBAD0F4F4018CEECF0AE774A8EF8DBAEB3F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sicherheitshinweis: Das Teilen von diesem Bild ohne Distanzierung kann zu einem Strafverfahren (inkl Hausdurchsuchungen) im deutschen Rechtsstaat führen. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/twitter-haftung-fuer-tweets-retweet-favorisieren-aeusserungsrecht https://www.nius.de/politik/news/hausdurchsuchung-wegen-retweet/180517b3-9bb1-4dc0-9139-ce76f49b760c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1857094491229790262
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 36362A35400443CB932B790B4962CBAD0F4F4018CEECF0AE774A8EF8DBAEB3F5
createdAtMillis - 1731608405311
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 185709449122979026236362A35400443CB932B790B4962CBAD0F4F4018CEECF0AE774A8EF8DBAEB3F5