Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 07:55:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C9D6DF9A6F79CEA42AF74F14AC046B0ABCBDF9525EDB04FEA5E80870831436D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sicherheitshinweis: Das Teilen von diesem Bild ohne Distanzierung kann zu einem Strafverfahren (inkl Hausdurchsuchungen) im deutschen Rechtsstaat führen. https://www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/twitter-haftung-fuer-tweets-retweet-favorisieren-aeusserungsrecht https://www.nius.de/politik/news/hausdurchsuchung-wegen-retweet/180517b3-9bb1-4dc0-9139-ce76f49b760c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1857094491229790262
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2C9D6DF9A6F79CEA42AF74F14AC046B0ABCBDF9525EDB04FEA5E80870831436D
createdAtMillis - 1731657316998
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18570944912297902622C9D6DF9A6F79CEA42AF74F14AC046B0ABCBDF9525EDB04FEA5E80870831436D