Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 04:49:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8603A886C6AC5B4A6CB8E51D8B3900BB3D08CE7014183D2F596538FBC5F8B53
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims are merely oddities that seems suspicious to the candidate. The "rebuttal" by election officials are nothing but generic claims of fairness as if written by someone who had not even read the concerns expressed by the candidate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856911092460535830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8603A886C6AC5B4A6CB8E51D8B3900BB3D08CE7014183D2F596538FBC5F8B53
  • createdAtMillis - 1731559752732
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856911092460535830F8603A886C6AC5B4A6CB8E51D8B3900BB3D08CE7014183D2F596538FBC5F8B53