Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 18:14:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7053F3EA072EE2224F098E181D8C0835A8C60D0291EF2069F575E0B3E3D1923
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims are merely oddities that seems suspicious to the candidate. The "rebuttal" by election officials are nothing but generic claims of fairness as if written by someone who had not even read the concerns expressed by the candidate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856911092460535830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7053F3EA072EE2224F098E181D8C0835A8C60D0291EF2069F575E0B3E3D1923
  • createdAtMillis - 1731608065091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856911092460535830E7053F3EA072EE2224F098E181D8C0835A8C60D0291EF2069F575E0B3E3D1923