Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 21:04:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE00CD54AE11F5E4B5E56C65DA4BE1C3387A16CFC6843708726CE33D98280616
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims are merely oddities that seems suspicious to the candidate. The "rebuttal" by election officials are nothing but generic claims of fairness as if written by someone who had not even read the concerns expressed by the candidate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856911092460535830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE00CD54AE11F5E4B5E56C65DA4BE1C3387A16CFC6843708726CE33D98280616
  • createdAtMillis - 1731618263390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856911092460535830CE00CD54AE11F5E4B5E56C65DA4BE1C3387A16CFC6843708726CE33D98280616