Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 12:41:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims are merely oddities that seems suspicious to the candidate. The "rebuttal" by election officials are nothing but generic claims of fairness as if written by someone who had not even read the concerns expressed by the candidate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856911092460535830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53
  • createdAtMillis - 1731588112702
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18569110924605358304EA53B51AE46C2DDA9FEA7E95CAE4BEF0C8DB687B3F10AA7BA0E67F6F47F9D53