Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 20:07:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28E748CF14C31438FF687A75D6A230A3EB67E6FC399B37BA92857F16507D3C22
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims are merely oddities that seems suspicious to the candidate. The "rebuttal" by election officials are nothing but generic claims of fairness as if written by someone who had not even read the concerns expressed by the candidate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856911092460535830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28E748CF14C31438FF687A75D6A230A3EB67E6FC399B37BA92857F16507D3C22
  • createdAtMillis - 1731614865361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185691109246053583028E748CF14C31438FF687A75D6A230A3EB67E6FC399B37BA92857F16507D3C22