Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 14:18:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98B6E443E6168B00292B7A1148862093F2FEA7E306D386767151F4581559B15C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ni los métodos ni las conclusiones de la grafología están sustentados por evidencia científica, por lo que, en sentido estricto, se le considera una pseudo ciencia. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4223445.stm https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grafolog%C3%ADa https://quackwatch.org/related/Tests/grapho/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856886856098381840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98B6E443E6168B00292B7A1148862093F2FEA7E306D386767151F4581559B15C
  • createdAtMillis - 1731593917621
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185688685609838184098B6E443E6168B00292B7A1148862093F2FEA7E306D386767151F4581559B15C