Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 01:32:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of the piece on the Guardian was painting a scenario to illustrate the contradictions and complexities around enforcing laws on child pornography, in particular in regards to claims of “accidental” visits to websites containing CSAM. Original article: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/jan/14/childprotection.rodliddle

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1856852712001786149
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5
createdAtMillis - 1731547973487
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1856852712001786149F338F09F837F1241934B7E032C5F2908A1A01124DE1EEC785CDCB55CBF4CABD5